Her husband's pardons, issued in the closing hours of his presidency, were simply routine exercise in the use of the pardon power, and none were aimed at protecting the Clinton presidency or legacy, she said.
Really? The pardon of his whitewater co-conspirator doesn't "protect the Clinton legacy"?
But for this matter, let's assume that Libby is a perjurer, that he deliberately lied under oath. And for the sake of argument, let's also assume Bush let him off the hook to protect himself (and was wrong to do so). All on the same page?
So how does 1 bad act, done in bad faith, make him worse than a man who did that same bad act 140 on his last day ALONE?
It doesn't. And Hillary knows it.
But fairness and truthfulness aren't considered virtures to our brothers on the left.
No comments:
Post a Comment